Tuesday, September 29, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Source document· January 26, 2026

Take the Zacks Approach to Beat the Markets: Drilling Tools, Alcoa & Starbucks in Focus

View original at finance.yahoo.com
Take the Zacks Approach to Beat the Markets: Drilling Tools, Alcoa & Starbucks in Focus Major U.S. indexes like the Nasdaq Composite, the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied 2.4%, 1.8%, and 1.3%, respectively, during holiday-shortened trading last week…
Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • Over 10-year period (2016-2025), equal-weight Zacks Rank #1 stocks portfolio outperformed equal-weight S&P 500 by more than 7 percentage points (+18.55% vs. +11.65%)

    80% confidence
  • Fresh tariff threats to countries opposing acquisition of Greenland

    80% confidence
  • Since 2012, Top 10 portfolio produced cumulative return of +2,472.7% vs. +561.6% for S&P 500 and +403.3% for equal-weight version

    80% confidence
  • Zacks Focus List portfolio returned +22.1% in 2025 vs. +17.9% for the S&P 500 index and +11.4% for equal-weight version

    80% confidence
  • Zacks Focus List portfolio returned +18.41% in 2024 vs. +25.04% for S&P 500 and +13% for equal-weight S&P 500

    80% confidence
  • Zacks ECAP returned -1.67% for full year 2025 vs. S&P 500's +17.9% gain

    80% confidence
  • Hypothetical equal-weight portfolio returned +22.4% in 2024 vs. +13.7% for the equal-weight S&P 500 index

    80% confidence
  • Zacks ECAP returned +16.26% in 2024 vs. +24.89% for S&P 500

    80% confidence
  • Top 10 portfolio produced average annual return of +25.8% from 2012 through 2025 vs. +13.1% for S&P 500 and +10.5% for equal-weight version

    80% confidence
  • Zacks Focus List portfolio returned +29.54% in 2023 vs. +26.28% for S&P 500 and +13.61% for equal-weight S&P 500

    80% confidence
  • Zacks ECDP returned -0.6% in 2025 vs. +6.8% for NOBL

    80% confidence
  • Zacks Focus List portfolio returned -15.2% in 2022 vs. S&P 500's -17.96%

    80% confidence
  • Zacks ECDP returned -2.1% in Q4 2025 vs. S&P 500's +2.7% gain and NOBL's +1.6% return

    80% confidence
  • Zacks ECAP portfolio returned -2.3% in Q4 2025 vs. S&P 500's +2.7% gain

    80% confidence
  • Suggested a collaborative framework for Greenland during World Economic Forum at Davos summit

    80% confidence
  • Equal-weight portfolio of Zacks Rank #1 stocks outperformed the equal-weight S&P 500 index by 7 percentage points (+17.81% vs. +10.85%)

    80% confidence
  • Zacks Top 10 portfolio returned +62.98% in 2024 vs. +25.04% for S&P 500 and +13% for equal-weight version

    80% confidence
  • Zacks Top 10 portfolio returned +22.6% in 2025 vs. +17.9% for S&P 500 and +11.4% for equal-weight version

    80% confidence
What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
The Agentic Takeover of the CFO's Office
Enterprise finance software vendors—BlackLine, OneStream, Numero AI, and Oracle—are racing to embed autonomous AI agents into core financial operations (close, consolidation, reporting), backed by consolidation M&A (Numero-Royu, BlackLine-WiseLayer), fresh leadership hires, and survey data showing nearly a quarter of CFOs plan to boost AI spending over 50%. Adoption momentum is strong even as at least one bellwether (Oracle) sees its stock lag year-to-date, suggesting the market hasn't yet fully priced in the shift from AI-as-feature to AI-as-agent in finance.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Two significantly different EPS values (10.21 vs 2.68 USD_per_share) are reported for Morgan Stanley on the same observation date (2025-12-31). Fact A specifies FY 2025, while Fact B's 'N/A' fiscal period is ambiguous. If both represent FY 2025 annual EPS, these values directly conflict. The magnitude of the difference (3.8x) is too large to attribute to rounding or minor calculation variations. The missing fiscal period in Fact B raises data quality concerns, but same-date observation + same attribute should reference the same period.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,314 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com
Take the Zacks Approach to Beat the Markets: Drilling Tools, Alcoa & Starbucks in Focus — Source | Via News | Finance Via News