Wednesday, September 16, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Press releaseGlobeNewswire· May 19, 2026

Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action Against Upstart Holdings, Inc.and Certain Officers – UPST

View original at globenewswire.com
Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action Against Upstart Holdings, Inc.and Certain Officers – UPST NEW YORK, May 19, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Upstart Holdings, Inc…
Opening lines of the source · GlobeNewswire · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • Upstart expected to generate Q4 2025 revenue of approximately $288 million

    60% confidence
  • Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding Upstart's business, operations, and prospects: (i) Model 22 frequently overreacted to negative macroeconomic signals in its risk-separation processes; (ii) Model 22's overall accuracy and propensity to increase loan approval rates was overstated; (iii) Model 22's overly conservative assessment was having a significant negative impact on revenues, rendering FY 2025 guidance unreliable and/or unrealistic; (iv) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times

    60% confidence
  • Upstart had knowingly calibrated its AI model to be more conservative on the credit side in earlier parts of Q3 2025, and that Model 22's overresponsiveness to macroeconomic signals would continue to negatively impact Q4 2025 revenues

    60% confidence
  • Upstart raised FY 2025 revenue guidance to approximately $1.01 billion, maintaining fee revenue guidance at approximately $920 million

    60% confidence
  • Upstart substantially raised FY 2025 revenue guidance to approximately $1.055 billion with fee revenue of approximately $990 million, attributing the increase to improvements in performance driven by Model 22

    60% confidence
  • Upstart issued FY 2025 financial guidance of approximately $1 billion total revenue and approximately $920 million in fee revenue

    60% confidence
  • Model 22 had overreacted to macroeconomic signals during Q3 2025, reducing borrower approvals and conversion rates and negatively impacting revenues

    60% confidence
  • Upstart's AI models more accurately quantify the true risk of a loan through risk separation, leading to higher approvals and lower interest rates relative to traditional lending practices and providing more predictable returns to capital partners including banks, credit unions, and institutional investors

    60% confidence
  • Upstart negatively revised its FY 2025 revenue guidance to approximately $1.035 billion and reduced fee revenue outlook to approximately $946 million from $990 million

    60% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI's 'Show-Me' Reckoning: Earnings Divergence, Executive Exodus, and Regulatory Tightening
Investors are shifting from rewarding AI narratives to demanding tangible results, evidenced by Adobe's weak guidance despite user-growth emphasis, Palantir's stock decline even after winning the Army's TITAN contract, and UiPath's contrasting guidance raise. Simultaneously, high-profile safety-driven departures from Anthropic and Google, plus new regulatory actions (California's under-16 social media ban, Anthropic's misuse-blocking disclosures), signal mounting scrutiny of AI's societal and financial risk profile even as fintech-adjacent funding (Socure) continues.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,981
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,981 facts checked against source5,288 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com