Friday, October 2, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
News articleNasdaq· January 6, 2026

The Motley Fool Interviews NYU Professor Vasant Dhar: Thinking With Machines

View original at nasdaq.com
The Motley Fool Interviews NYU Professor Vasant Dhar: Thinking With Machines Motley Fool analyst Asit Sharma recently talked with Vasant Dhar about the brave new world of AI…
Opening lines of the source · Nasdaq · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • We are slipping into a Huxleyan kind of world where we are gradually disempowering ourselves in many areas of our life, with machines becoming gatekeepers of human activity

    80% confidence
  • Super forecasters anchor themselves in the right part of problems and tend to be relatively unbiased

    80% confidence
  • In 2015 conversation, concluded that trading flows would disappear but venture capital and private equity would remain safe from AI automation

    80% confidence
  • Humans have bounded rationality - limited cognitive resources, cannot enumerate all alternatives, use heuristics to find acceptable choices

    80% confidence
  • Lost spatial navigation ability by relying on maps

    80% confidence
  • Right now, machines don't write as well as humans

    80% confidence
  • The burden of responsible AI consumption is on the consumer more than any other stakeholder

    80% confidence
  • First question when evaluating Nvidia in 2023 was whether AI is an instrumental or disruptive technology

    80% confidence
  • Won 80% of 1,526 matches while winning only 54% of points

    80% confidence
  • In 2015, believed machine learning applied to short-term trading but was too hard to apply to long-term investing due to insufficient training data

    80% confidence
  • Using AI as a crutch will lead to cognitive decline in the long run

    80% confidence
  • Social media platforms have caused tremendous harm to teenagers

    80% confidence
  • Writing the book himself was much more fun and satisfying than using ChatGPT would have been

    80% confidence
  • OpenAI doesn't want to be the moral police of the world and will open ChatGPT to adult content

    80% confidence
  • Post-ChatGPT, it became possible to build a bot that replicates Aswath Damodaran's valuation thinking

    80% confidence
  • Nvidia will have a dominant position in AI as a winner in disruption scenario

    80% confidence
  • Initial attempts to fine-tune LLM with Damodaran's valuations did not work - it didn't sound like him and lacked depth

    80% confidence
  • Small edges compound over time - you don't need to be perfect or really good, just slightly better than average for success

    80% confidence
  • AI can be consumed to become superhuman and amplify skills if used correctly, or lead to cognitive decline if you become dependent

    80% confidence
  • Aswath Damodaran is a super forecaster with ability to ask right questions and anchor himself in unbiased parts of problems

    80% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI-Driven Drug Development Meets Biotech Deal-Making and Regulatory Catalysts
AI-designed therapeutics (Insilico's rentosertib showing biological-age reductions) are moving into the clinical mainstream. Large-cap biotech is simultaneously reallocating capital through M&A (Lilly–Merida, $2.9B) and government funding (BARDA–Basilea), while trial failures (ziltivekimab, a 9.4% Novo Nordisk share drop) and upcoming FDA catalysts (the ivonescimab PDUFA on 2026-11-14) drive volatility. The wider AI regulatory and legal climate (Tesla Cybercab probe, xAI's Minnesota loss, OpenAI suits) is tightening, though QAIAx's micro-cap trial claims are speculative and weakly connected.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,985
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,985 facts checked against source5,327 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com