Wednesday, September 16, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
News articleCrunchbase News

They Saw Women Shut Out Of VC, So A PayPal Veteran And Former Navy Officer Built An Alternative

View original at news.crunchbase.com
Crunchbase News - Funding Ma Title: They Saw Women Shut Out Of VC, So A PayPal Veteran And Former Navy Officer Built An Alternative Date: 2026-05-29 11:00 Source: https://news.crunchbase.com/diversity/venture-women-owned-startup-funding-aequitas-invest/ <p>Women-led startups consistently receive less than 2% of U.S…
Opening lines of the source · Crunchbase News · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • There are approximately 50 active Reg CF platforms in the U.S., and AQi is the only one founded by women, owned by women, and exclusively serving women-owned businesses

    60% confidence
  • Women-led startups deliver 2.5x better returns than male-founded startups

    60% confidence
  • There is a $5 trillion gap in global GDP resulting from women entrepreneurs lacking access to capital

    60% confidence
  • Women entrepreneurs earn 78 cents for every dollar invested, compared to 31 cents for men

    60% confidence
  • Traditional VCs often demand board seats, veto rights, and up to 20% equity; AQi founders typically give up only 5-10% equity

    60% confidence
  • On platforms like Kickstarter, founders might only keep about 60% of the funds raised; AQi's success fee is only 6.5%

    60% confidence
  • For many companies, $5 million is a strong runway for 18 to 24 months; Reg CF rolling raises allow up to $5 million every 12 months

    60% confidence
  • Women start nearly half of all U.S. businesses but receive only 2% of venture capital and less than 20% of small business loans

    60% confidence
  • AQi acts as a 'concierge' service with personal relationships vs. larger platforms that use AI-driven automated checklists

    60% confidence
  • Women-led startups consistently receive less than 2% of U.S. venture capital

    60% confidence
  • The VC space is unlikely to change soon because it is heavily reliant on 'pattern matching,' creating significant barriers for women founders

    60% confidence
  • AQi uses special-purpose vehicles to consolidate all Reg CF investors into a single cap table line item, keeping the cap table clean for future investors

    60% confidence
  • For every dollar a woman earns in her business, she creates significant economic benefit for her community and family

    60% confidence
  • AQi currently has a pipeline of 20 businesses; first campaign closed in May 2026 with two more launching in coming weeks

    60% confidence

Cited in these Via News reports

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI's 'Show-Me' Reckoning: Earnings Divergence, Executive Exodus, and Regulatory Tightening
Investors are shifting from rewarding AI narratives to demanding tangible results, evidenced by Adobe's weak guidance despite user-growth emphasis, Palantir's stock decline even after winning the Army's TITAN contract, and UiPath's contrasting guidance raise. Simultaneously, high-profile safety-driven departures from Anthropic and Google, plus new regulatory actions (California's under-16 social media ban, Anthropic's misuse-blocking disclosures), signal mounting scrutiny of AI's societal and financial risk profile even as fintech-adjacent funding (Socure) continues.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,981
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,981 facts checked against source5,288 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com