Sunday, September 27, 2026

Regional banks shift away from small business loans as charge-offs spike in 2025

Regional banks are redirecting lending portfolios toward lower-risk commercial and industrial loans after small business portfolios drove elevated charge-offs through 2025. First Bank's non-performing assets climbed to 46 basis points in Q4 2025, up from 36 basis points, as small business credit stress accelerated.

Regional banks shift away from small business loans as charge-offs spike in 2025
Image generated by AI for illustrative purposes. Not actual footage or photography from the reported events.

Regional banks recorded concentrated credit losses in small business lending portfolios during 2025, prompting a strategic shift toward commercial and industrial loans and owner-occupied real estate.

First Bank's non-performing assets rose to 46 basis points of total assets in Q4 2025, up from 36 basis points in the prior quarter. Chief Credit Officer Andrew Hibshman said charge-offs during 2025 occurred "almost exclusively in the small business portfolio."

The bank responded by redirecting origination activity. C&I and owner-occupied real estate loans comprised 62% of 2025 originations, according to Chief Lending Officer Peter Cahill. First Bank also experienced $135 million in Q4 loan payoffs, representing 47% of annual payoffs.

CEO John Martin guided investors to expect charge-offs "in a 15-20 basis-point range" going forward, signaling continued pressure in small business segments.

The shift reflects broader stress in small business credit quality as elevated interest rates and softening demand impact borrowers with limited balance sheet cushions. Regional banks typically hold higher concentrations of small business loans compared to larger institutions, making them more vulnerable to sector-specific deterioration.

C&I loans and owner-occupied commercial real estate carry lower loss rates during credit cycles. Owner-occupied properties benefit from direct borrower involvement in the asset, reducing default risk. C&I loans to established businesses typically feature stronger covenants and monitoring.

The portfolio rebalancing marks a risk management response to late-cycle credit conditions. Small business loans often show stress earlier than other commercial segments due to thinner capital buffers and revenue volatility.

Regional bank investors are monitoring NPA ratios and charge-off guidance as indicators of credit cycle positioning. Banks with high small business concentrations face pressure to demonstrate proactive risk management while maintaining loan growth targets.

The trend suggests regional banks are prioritizing credit quality over volume as economic uncertainty persists into 2026.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,984
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,984 facts checked against source5,306 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com